CYBRUM SOLUTIONS

Is safhe par

Chapter 07

Workflow Design & Diagnosis

Kaunse steps AI ko dene chahiye, jab kaam bigadne lage to kaise diagnose karein, aur AI kya karta hai wo kaise batayein

Ye chapter CCAO-F ke Workflow Integration and Solution Design aur Troubleshooting and Optimization domains ke liye foundation hai

Core Idea

2 teams ne same AI assistant same kaam ke liye use kiya: contract review. Pehli team ne kaam step-by-step map kiya, AI clauses nikalta, playbook se departures flag karta, redline draft karta, aur ek lawyer har change approve karta, review time aadha ho gaya, quality wahi rahi. Doosri team ne AI ko poore process pe laga diya, drafting acha tha isliye low-risk clauses unsupervised approve karne diye, ek mahine mein ek approved clause ne aisi obligation bana di jo kisi ne nahi pakdi, aur team ne tool hi hata diya. Same product, same process, same model. Farq sirf ye tha ke kaunse steps kisne handover kiye.

Output verdict nahi hai.

Ek achha result ye nahi batata ke step handover karna safe tha. Ek bura result ye nahi batata ke kaam ho hi nahi sakta. Jo batata hai wo neeche ki structure hai: ye kaunsa step tha, galat hone pe kya cost hai, iska jawab kaun deta hai, aur symptom kab shuru hua.

Poora Course, Ek Minute Mein

StageWo Sawal Jo Decide Karta Hai
DesignAsal requirements kya hain, aur kaunse numbers compute hone chahiye?
MapIs step ke liye: undo ho sakta hai? Error ki cost kya hai? Jawab kaun deta hai?
BuildYe abhi bhi prompt-and-iterate loop mein fit hota hai, ya ye usse bada ho gaya?
DiagnoseSymptom sabse pehle kab dikha?
PersistYe fix ek rule hai, ek reference hai, ya ek procedure hai?
CommunicateYe kya karta hai, aur human gate exactly kahan hai?

Part 1 · Design The Work Before You Place The Tool

1. Unit Of Value Hai Step, Session Nahi

“Main AI use karta hoon” aur “hamara workflow AI use karta hai” mein farq hai:

“Main AI Use Karta Hoon”

Personal habit hai. Aapke mood aur waqt se badalti hai, jab aap leave pe ho, ghayab ho jati hai.

“Hamara Workflow AI Use Karta Hai”

Repeatable process hai jo team chalati hai, AI named steps karta hai har baar, wahi tareeke se, keyboard pe koi bhi ho.

Sirf doosra wala compound hota hai. Sirf doosra wala aisi tarah galat ho sakta hai jo galat rehti chali jaye

Isi liye is course ka unit step hai, session nahi. Session wo cheez hai jise aap baad mein judge karte ho, result achha laga ya nahi. Step wo cheez hai jiska decision aap pehle se lete ho, un grounds pe jo output achha lagne se nahi badalte. Opening ki 2 teams ke paas same product tha, farq ye tha ke ek ne step-level decisions liye, doosri ne session-level judgement.

2. Requirements Nikaalo, Phir Attack Karo

Real kaam kabhi clean brief se shuru nahi hota, 40-page document, adhoore emails, aur meeting mein kisi ki kahi hui baat se hota hai. Kuch banane se pehle, ye requirements banni chahiye: specific, traceable, testable. Ye 5 cheezein settle honi chahiye:

  • Kya produce ho raha hai
  • Kiske liye
  • Kitni baar chalta hai
  • Kaunse data se
  • Kaunse format mein

Ehtiyat

“Report month-end ke baad promptly deliver honi chahiye” ek requirement lagti hai, hai nahi. 2 din aur 2 hafte dono kisi ke liye “prompt” hain, isliye 2 teams 2 alag processes banate hain aur dono believe karte hain ke unhe wahi bataya gaya tha. Test: agar aap ye nahi keh saktay ke kaunsa evidence prove karega ke requirement poori hui, wo abhi decidable nahi hai, chahe wo kitni bhi specific lage.

Summary mat maango, structure maango, aur ek source column maango, isse koi bhi jo room mein nahi tha list check kar sakta hai. Extraction sirf pehla pass hai, trustworthy wala nahi, jo requirements teams ko bid haraati hain wo shayad hi seedhe likhi hoti hain, wo ek subordinate clause mein baithi hoti hain, extraction ye dhoondti hai jo likha gaya tha, wo nahi jo matlab tha, isliye extract karne ke baad, apni hi list review karwao.

3. Plan Utni Hi Achi Hai Jitne Uske Neeche Ke Numbers

Planning kaam mein 2 cheezein milti hain jinhe AI bilkul alag tarike se handle karta hai. Synthesis (considerations gather karna, options structure karna) AI achi karta hai. Calculation alag hai, is wajah se nahi ke model add nahi kar sakta, wo kar sakta hai, problem ye hai ke page pe aap bata nahi sakte ke usne kiya ya nahi. Ek likha hua figure aur ek calculate kiya hua figure identical dikhte hain.

Agar ek result matter karta hai, usay compute karo. Kabhi likho mat.

Data upload karo aur numbers code execution se produce karwao, sentence mein likhwane ki bajaye. Guessed utilisation rate pe bani staffing plan sirf table mein ek guess hai. Wahi plan actual timesheet data ke computed analysis pe bani ho to har line se defend ho sakti hai, kyunke har line ek calculation tak trace hoti hai jise koi bhi dobara chala sakta hai.

4. AI Ka Insight Kahan Actually Plan Badalta Hai

Ek operations lead ne poori capacity plan ek hi request mein maangi: ticket data analyse karo, growth trend nikalo, agle quarter ka headcount recommend karo. Jawab well-structured tha aur 3 analysts hire karne ki recommend kar raha tha. Team 2 hafte pehle announce hui hiring freeze mein thi. Trend analysis theek tha, recommendation usi se follow hui, plan useless is liye tha kyunke ek step ko aisi input chahiye thi jo dataset mein kahin nahi thi: ek meeting ka decision.

Step TypeChalta Kaise Hai
Synthesis stepsUs information pe chalte hain jo aap supply kar sakte ho, achi tarah delegate hote hain
Judgement stepsUs information pe chalte hain jo supply nahi ho sakti (risk appetite, hiring freeze, CFO kis department ko bacha raha hai), human hi rehte hain

Window Test

“Kya main is step ki har zaroorat window mein daal sakta hoon? Agar nahi, ye step mera hai.” Ye test pass karna step ko AI ke liye eligible banata hai, kabhi owned nahi, eligible step ko bhi Part 2 ke 3 criteria se guzarna parta hai.

Research bhi ek synthesis step hai, isi liye window test usay bhi lagta hai, lekin ek alag tarah fail hoti hai: model ka knowledge ek date pe rukta hai, us ke baad ki har cheez window ke bahar hai:

Sawal Kis Baare Mein HaiJawab Kahan Se Aana Chahiye
Ek stable concept ya methodModel ka apna knowledge theek hai
Kuch bhi current, priced, ya datedEk external source jise aap khol saktay ho, sirf answer nahi, link bhi maango

Part 2 · The Delegation Map

Ye course ka core hai. Har step 3 decisions leta hai:

1Eligibility: kya AI ye touch kar sakta hai? (data allowed hai, aur har zaroorat supply ho sakti hai)
2Ownership: iska owner kaun hai? (reversibility, stakes, accountability)
3Implementation: ise kaun carry karta hai? (sirf un steps ke liye jo pehle 2 pass karein)

Ehtiyat

Teesra decision doosre mein mat mix karo. “Ye compute hona chahiye” sach hai, aur implementation column mein jata hai. Ye AI ko step handover karne ki wajah nahi hai, aur isay wajah banana hi wo tareeqa hai jis se ek high-stakes calculation unreviewed reh jati hai.
Step Kya HaiKaun Carry Karta Hai
Fixed steps wali repeatable procedureSkill
Rules aur reference jo step ko hamesha chahiyeProject knowledge
Ek calculation jis pe output depend karta haiCode execution
Har output pe ek standing constraintStanding instruction
Ek step jiska owner insaan haiEk named review gate

5. 3 Criteria Har Step Decide Karte Hain

AI ke sath redesign karne se pehle, steps order mein likho aur har ek ko classify karo: AI-appropriate, human-retained, ya collaborative.

Reversibility

Kya AI galat kare to undo ho sakta hai? Draft dobara likh sakte ho, bheja hua email nahi

Stakes

Bad case mein galti ki cost kya hai? Average case nahi, worst case

Accountability

Kya ye step khud wo decision hai jiska jawab dena hai, ya sirf ek input hai jo koi aur judge karega?

Score add nahi karte, 3 mein se usually ek decide karta hai, baaki do agree karte hain, jahan ye disagree karein wahan sabse strict jeetta hai

Note

Ye deliberately absent hai: test run mein AI ne kitna achha kiya, ye criterion nahi hai. Sabse relevant fact lagta hai aur sabse zyada misguide karta hai (Concept 7 mein wajah).

6. Do Workflows, Same Criteria, Alag Answers

Contract review, poori tarah mapped:

StepOwnerCriterionCarried By
Clauses extract karoAIReversible, low stakesSkill
Playbook departures flag karoAIReversible, error redline pe surface hota haiSkill
Redline aur rationale draft karoCollaborativeHigh stakes, human har edit judge karta haiSkill + gate
Penalty clause ka financial exposure compute karoAIReversible, aur approval gate pe check hota haiCode execution
Har change approve/reject karoHumanYe step khud wo decision hai jiska jawab dena haiNamed reviewer
Sign aur send karoHumanIrreversible aur externally bindingNamed signer

Penalty-exposure row pe gauro se dekho, arithmetic hona step ko low-stakes nahi banata, wo delegable is liye hai kyunke result reversible hai aur agli row mein hi ek human ke saamne aata hai. Approval gate hata do, ye step AI-appropriate nahi rehta, chahe arithmetic wahi rahe.

Playbook row bhi same logic pe chalti hai, wo yahan AI-appropriate is liye hai kyunke koi agli row mein flags parhta hai. Wahi step ek workflow mein daalo jahan koi flags nahi parhta, wo collaborative ho jati hai. Step nahi badla, ye badla ke koi uske baad khada hai ya nahi.

7. Map Galat Hone Ke 3 Tareeke

Opening ki doosri team careless nahi thi, unhone hafton AI ko achi redlines draft karte dekha, phir easy clauses approve karne diye. Ye evidence ka reasonable response hai. Ye ek workflow ke liye risk kamane ka sabse common tareeqa bhi hai.

Halo Delegation

Step AI ko diya kyunke pichla step acha gaya, competence real thi, lekin doosre step ki thi

Unstaffed Gate

"AI draft, human review" tab tak collaborative hai jab tak koi actually review kare, warna ye ek automated step hai

Mapping The Tool

Team us feature ke around workflow banati hai jo unhe pasand hai, kaam ke around nahi

Galat maps false statements se nahi bantay, sahi statements ke galat step pe apply hone se bantay hain

Drafting quality draft ke baare mein evidence hai. Decision ke baare mein evidence nahi hai.

Yaad Rakho

Agar is course se ek habit lo, to ye lo: gates jo maine design kiye, kya wo actually abhi bhi staffed hain?

8. Map Ka Owner Kaun Hai

Ek delegation map ek dafa likhi jati hai, phir chupke se galat ho jati hai, kyunke workflow uske neeche move ho gaya. Ek step add hua, ek reviewer ka role badla, quarterly volume double ho gaya. 3 controls isi tarah decay karte hain, koi signal diye bina:

Kya Decay Karta HaiFailure Ke Waqt Signal
Ek review gateKoi nahi
Ek standing instructionKoi nahi
Khud mapKoi nahi

Iska sirf ek countermeasure hai: ek scheduled read. Map pe 2 cheezein likhi honi chahiye: ek owner (ek named person, team nahi), aur ek review date (quarterly default hai). Review 4 sawalon mein 20 minute leta hai:

  • Koi step add ya remove hua hai jo map pe nahi hai?
  • Har collaborative step ke liye: pichle hafte kisne review kiya, kitna waqt diya? Agar koi jawab nahi de sakta, step automated ho chuka hai
  • Kya volume ya stakes badle hain?
  • Kya har configuration jis pe map depend karta hai abhi bhi current hai?

Part 3 · Build It, Aur Dekho

9. Loop: Ideate, Prototype, Feedback, Refine

AI ek design collaborator hai, vending machine nahi. Solution ek dafa maang ke nahi milta, loop chala ke milta hai, aur ise ek Project ke andar chalao takay context stable rahe.

1Ideate: options banao
2Prototype: ek option concrete banao
3Feedback: jo galat hai wo saamne aaye
4Refine: usay fix karo
Loop repeat

Ek team ne 3 cycles mein bina code likhe ek dashboard artifact banaya. Cycle 1 mein sab kaam kar gaya. Cycle 2 mein date filter aur totals row maangi, filter theek tha, totals galat, subtle tarike se, kyunke totals likhe gaye the, compute nahi hue the. Cycle 3 (colour, print layout) pehli baar mein kaam kar gaya.

Farq Samjho

Cycle 3 ek description problem thi, behtar describe karne se solve ho gayi. Cycle 2 ek feature problem thi, kitna bhi describe karo wo solve nahi hoti, kyunke jo maanga gaya tha wo prose ki cheez nahi thi.

10. Jab Ye Prompt-and-Iterate Se Bahar Nikal Jaye

Wahi dashboard 6 mahine baad 3 departments har Monday khol rahe hain, aur ek board pack mein numbers ja rahe hain. Ye ab ek alag cheez hai, aur kisi ne decide nahi kiya ke ye ho.

SignalMatlabKahan Jao
Doosre log ab is pe depend karte hainYe infrastructure hai, engineering chahiyeDeveloper ya architect expertise
Maine ye same tareeke se 3 dafa solve kiyaShape stable hai, manufacture ho sakta haiFrom One-Off to Worker chapter

Dependency escalation signal hai. Jis waqt doosre log kisi cheez ko infrastructure ki tarah rely karte hain, usay uptime, access control, aur ek fixed guarantee chahiye hoti hai, ye prompt-and-iterate ka kaam nahi rehta.

Part 4 · Jab Ye Bigadta Hai

11. 4 Causes, Timing Se Pehchano

Jab output disappoint kare, log 2 unproductive kaam karte hain: tool ko impossible declare karte hain, ya random words badalte rehte hain. Dono ek hi sawal skip karte hain: symptom sabse pehle kab dikha?

Under-specification

Pehli response se hi galat, prompt ne kabhi zaroori cheez di hi nahi

Context Overload

Session shuru mein sahi thi, phir badhte badhte degrade ho gayi

Wrong Feature Ya Model

Ek specific, repeatable error type, poori tarah ganda nahi

Stale Configuration

"Pehle kaam karta tha", kuch setup ke andar drift ho gaya hai

Timing free information hai, aap ke paas already hai, ye batati hai kahan pehle dekhna hai
Symptom Kab DikhaPehla HypothesisCheap ConfirmationFix
Pehli reply se hi galatUnder-specificationPrompt dobara parho, kya missing cheez usme hai?Jo chhoot gaya wo add karo
Shuru sahi tha, phir kharab huaContext overloadFresh session mein instruction dobara likho, hold karti hai?Restart ya summarize karo
Ek repeatable error typeWrong feature/modelSahi feature ya stronger tier se ek dafa chalaoFeature ya tier badlo
Pehle kaam karta tha, ab nahiStale configurationInstruction ya knowledge source ki date check karoConfiguration maintain karo

Ehtiyat

Stale configuration khamosh se fail hoti hai, koi error nahi, koi warning nahi. Isi liye ye unstaffed gate ka twin hai, dono controls jo sahi set up huay the, sabke assume karte hue ke wo abhi bhi hold kar rahe hain, decay karte hain. Scheduled review se milte hain, notice karne se nahi.

12. Sequence Sabse Sasta Pehle Chalta Hai

  1. 1

    Prompt Dobara Parho

    5 components ke against check karo: role, context, task, constraints, output format

  2. 2

    Conversation Length Check Karo

    Context overload ho sakta hai, restart ya summary chahiye

  3. 3

    Feature Aur Model Check Karo

    Kya ye ek calculation hai jise code execution chahiye, ya complex task jo speed tier pe hai?

  4. 4

    Configuration Check Karo

    Kya instructions, knowledge, aur Skills current hain?

  5. 5

    Sirf Ab, Task Fit Pe Sawal Uthao

    Sabse expensive conclusion, sirf tab jab upar wale 4 rule out ho chuke hon

Reversal

Zyada log ulta karte hain, sabse capable model pe switch karte hain ya task ko impossible declare karte hain, ladder ke neeche se, upar kuch check kiye bina. Dono aksar zaroori nahi hotay.
ComplaintDiagnosisFix
Summary key points miss karti rehti haiUnder-specification"Key" ke criteria naam do
Format aadhe mein follow karna chhod diyaContext overloadSummary se restart karo, ya format persist karo
Numbers subtly galat hainWrong featureCalculation ko code execution mein le jao
Pehle mahine sahi thi, ab off haiStale configurationInstructions aur knowledge sources audit karo
Agle quarter ka exact figure predict nahi kar saktiExpectation mismatchTask ko reshape karo (range + assumptions maango)

Part 5 · Fix Ko Permanent Banao

13. Reaction Ko Instruction Mein Badlo

Ek reactionbatati hai output kaisa laga (“too generic”). Ek instruction batati hai kya badle takay agla output different ho. Ek sawal se jump lagti hai: exactly kya present hona chahiye takay ye sahi ho, aur setup ka kaunsa hissa usay control karta hai?

ReactionInstructionKaunsa Lever
"Too generic"Audience naam do aur wo ek action jo unse chahiyePrompt
"Wrong tone"Ek tone constraint add karo jo har draft pe apply hoStanding instruction
"Point miss kar diya"Wo ek sawal batao jo output ko answer karna chahiye, shuru meinPrompt
"Purana data use ho raha hai"Knowledge base mein source document replace karoKnowledge

Ehtiyat

Agar lever naam nahi le sakte, critique abhi bhi ek reaction hai, aur agli koshish ek revision jaisi dikhne wali guess hogi.

14. Rule, Reference, Ya Procedure

Fix dhoondna aasan hissa hai. Mehnga failure use dhoond ke wapis kho dena hai. Test chhota hai: kya ye correction dobara chahiye hogi, mujhe ya kisi aur ko? Agar haan, configuration mein jani chahiye.

Rule → Standing Instruction

Kuch jo hamesha apply hona chahiye, behaviour badalta hai

Reference → Knowledge Base

Material jo har run ko dekhna chahiye, kya pata hai wo badalta hai

Procedure → Skill

Ek repeatable sequence with steps, kaam kaise hota hai wo badalta hai

Test: kya ye correction dobara chahiye hogi, mujhe ya kisi aur ko? Agar haan, configuration mein jani chahiye

2 Log, Ek Habit Ka Farq

Ek marketer notice karti hai ke har brief target segment miss karti hai, aur wo 2 standing instructions likh deti hai, ab sab ke liye theek. Ek analyst har mahine chat mein reminder type karta hai (cancelled orders exclude karo), 2 hafte leave pe jata hai, colleague report chalata hai, cancelled orders wapis andar hain. Fix hamesha se maujood tha, failure ye thi ke wo sirf ek jagah rakha tha jo sirf ek insaan dhoond sakta tha.

15. Optimize Karne Se Pehle Friction Dhoondo

SignalKaisa Dikhta HaiFix
RepetitionHar run mein wahi cheez paste/type karte hoSaved context ya standing instruction
CorrectionHar output mein wahi flaw fix karte hoConfiguration change
VarianceAlag log same task chala kar alag results paate hainShared Skill ya knowledge base

Variance wo hai jo teams miss karti hain, kyunke koi individually experience nahi karta, sab ka apna output consistent hai, inconsistency sirf logon ke darmiyan hai, isliye ye reviewer pe dikhti hai, source pe nahi.

  • Consolidate: jo steps saath chal saktay hain unhe saath chalao, 3 separate prompts jo same background maangte hain, ek prompt hain
  • Promote: repeated pattern ko configuration mein le jao (Concept 14)

16. Wo Cheez Measure Karo Jo Actually Matter Karti Hai

Pehle baseline measure karo. Ek workflow ko badalne se pehle ek dafa chalao aur 3 numbers record karo: kitna waqt laga, kitne revision rounds chahiye huay, kitne manual steps kiye. Baseline ke baghair aap ke paas ek improvement hai jis pe yaqeen hai lekin bata nahi sakte.

Workflow Agar...Optimize Karo Iske Liye
Internal draft haiTime (speed hi point hai)
Customer-facing report haiConsistency
Compliance/finance output haiAccuracy
Kai logon ka mila jula kaam haiVariance
  • Naya workflow purane ke sath parallel run karo 2-3 cycles ke liye, evidence aur ek fallback milta hai
  • Cost bata sako: usage cost + baaki insaan ka waqt (jo gates aap ne rakhe), saving = baseline × frequency × log, ek sentence jis pe manager act kar sake

Part 6 · Operate Karo, Explain Karo

17. Jab Bad Output Bahar Nikal Jaye

Ek gate ek busy Friday pe skip ho jati hai, configuration stale ho jati hai. Design karne wale ne pehle se ye 4 cheezein decide karni chahiye:

  1. 1

    1. Ye Kaise Ruke

    Sabse tez tareeqa workflow rokne ka kya hai, kaun rok sakta hai, kya unhe permission chahiye?

  2. 2

    2. Kya Already Bahar Ja Chuka Hai

    Ek output nahi, kitne outputs affect huay, kahan gaye?

  3. 3

    3. Kisay Batana Hai, Kab Tak

    Customer, internal owner, risk/compliance function, ye pehle se decide karo

  4. 4

    4. Map Mein Kya Badalta Hai

    Har incident design ke baare mein diagnostic data hai, map ko date ke sath update karo

18. Bolo Ye Kya Karta Hai, Phir Gate Ka Naam Lo

3 phrases chupke se overstate karti hain:

  • "Fully automated" — almost kabhi sach nahi, pehla visible error isay public expose karta hai
  • "AI handles X" — sentence se human gate hi gayab kar deta hai
  • "It's basically as good as a person" — ek standard set karta hai jo tool aakhir kaar miss karega

Repair

Har baar wahi hai: pehle batao tool kya karta hai, phir human checkpoint ka naam lo. Ek extra sentence, aur farq hai ek claim jo defend ho sakti hai aur ek jo nahi.

Same workflow, 3 audiences ko 3 tareeke se:

KisayKya Chahiye
Legal leadMechanism aur failure modes: "Redline draft karta hai, approval hamesha aapki hai, obligation implied wali cheez miss kar sakta hai"
Practice executiveOutcome aur oversight: "Turnaround 2 din se aadhe din hua hai, wahi approval standard"
Client ka risk functionSirf control: "Drafting AI-assisted hai, lawyer har term approve karta hai, sign-off ke bina kuch nahi jata"

Stakeholders ek AI workflow pe zyada trust karte hain, kam nahi, jab human checkpoints explicit hoon.

Poora Course, Compressed

Output verdict nahi hai. Step ko us se judge karo jo wo cost karta hai aur jiska jawab dena hai, failure ko us se judge karo jab wo shuru hui.

  • Unit step hai, session nahi, personal habit alag cheez hai team workflow se
  • Requirements ko structure mein nikalo, source ke sath, phir apni hi list pe ambiguity dhoondo
  • Jo result matter karta hai use compute karo, kabhi likho mat, window test se decide karo kaunsa step aapka hai
  • Har step 3 decisions leta hai: eligibility, ownership (reversibility/stakes/accountability), implementation, teesra doosre mein mix mat karo
  • 3 mapping errors: halo delegation, unstaffed gate, mapping the tool instead of work, sab true statements se bantay hain, galat step pe
  • Map ka ek named owner aur review date honi chahiye, scheduled read hi silent decay ka ilaj hai
  • 4 causes timing se pehchano: under-specification, context overload, wrong feature/model, stale configuration, diagnostic sequence sasta pehle chalta hai
  • Reaction ko instruction mein badlo (lever naam lo), fix ko rule/reference/procedure mein promote karo
  • Optimize karne se pehle baseline measure karo, sahi metric chuno, naye workflow ko parallel run karo
  • Bad output nikalne se pehle 4 cheezein decide karo: stop, scope, tell, map change, aur audience ke hisab se human gate ka naam hamesha lo

Ab Khud Try Karo: 5 Prompts

Sab ek sitting mein karne ki zaroorat nahi.

  1. 1

    1. Extract Karo, Phir Attack Karo

    Ek real document se har requirement table mein nikalwao (label, source section, direct/implied), phir usi list ko dobara review karwao ambiguity ke liye.

  2. 2

    2. Wo Step Dhoondo Jo Undo Nahi Ho Sakta

    Apna workflow do, sirf 3 sawal poochho: undo ho sakta hai? bad-case cost kya hai? ye decision hai ya input? Recommendation abhi mat maango.

  3. 3

    3. Timing Se Diagnose Karo

    Agla disappointing output, fix karne se pehle: describe karo kya hua aur kab, AI se ek-ek sawal poochwao jab tak diagnosis na mile.

  4. 4

    4. Ek Fix Promote Karo

    Ek correction dhoondo jo 2 se zyada dafa ki hai, poocho ye rule hai, reference hai, ya procedure, phir sahi format mein likhwao.

  5. 5

    5. 3 Tareeke Se Bolo

    Apna workflow describe karo, phir technical, executive, aur risk audience ke liye 3 descriptions likhwao, har ek mein human checkpoint naam lo.

Ek Project: Map, Break, Fix, Explain

Ek workflow, 6 hisse, roughly ek ghanta.

  1. 1

    1. Map Karo

    Real workflow ko table mein likho: step, owner, reason, har reason reversibility/stakes/accountability naam le.

  2. 2

    2. Features Rakho

    Har AI step ke liye batao kaun carry karta hai (Skill, knowledge, code execution, standing instruction), har human step ke liye person aur moment naam lo.

  3. 3

    3. Ek Step Real Mein Chalao

    Sabse mechanical AI step pe real input chalao.

  4. 4

    4. Jaan Bujh Ke Todo

    Ek figure prose mein maango jo compute honi chahiye thi, jab plausible galat number aaye, fix karne se pehle Concept 11 se diagnose karo.

  5. 5

    5. Ek Fix Promote Karo

    Step 3/4 mein jo correct kiya wo sahi home mein rakho.

  6. 6

    6. Baseline Measure Karo

    Ek unchanged run: time, revision rounds, manual steps.

  7. 7

    7. One-Page Map Bharo

    Owner, next review date, aur "agar galat ho jaye" wali 4 lines ke sath.

  8. 8

    8. 3 Descriptions Likho

    Technical, executive, risk, har ek mein gate ka naam.

One-Page Map: Copy Karo

DELEGATION MAP: [workflow name]
Owner: [ek named person]        Last reviewed: [date]      Next review: [date]

ELIGIBILITY (dono pass hone chahiye)
Data gate: [kya ye data is tool mein ja sakta hai? kisne confirm kiya?]
Input gate: [kya har step ki har zaroorat supply ho sakti hai?]

STEPS
#  Step          Owner          Criterion              Carried by
1  ...           AI             reversible, low stakes  Skill
2  ...           AI             reversible, checked     code execution
3  ...           Collaborative  high stakes, human judges  Skill + gate
4  ...           Human          ye decision hai         named reviewer
5  ...           Human          irreversible            named signer

GATES (har collaborative/human step ke liye ek line)
Step 3: review [naam], [kab], check kar raha [kya specifically]
Step 4: approve [naam], se pehle [aage kya hota hai]

BASELINE (change se pehle measured)
Time per run: ___   Revision rounds: ___   Manual steps: ___
Metric jo ye workflow optimize karta hai: [time | consistency | accuracy | variance]

AGAR GALAT HO JAYE
Roka kisne: [kaun, aur bina permission act kar sakte hain?]
Scope check: [kaise pata chalega kitne outputs affect huay?]
Bataya kisay: [kaun, kitne waqt mein]
Map change: [yahan record, date ke sath]

3 Lines Jo Sabse Zyada Kaam Karti Hain

Owner, next review date, aur har gate pe “exactly kya check ho raha hai”. Inke bina map ek decision describe karta hai. Inke sath, ek operation describe karta hai.

Is Chapter Ke Naye Terms

Exam ke liye ye poori glossary yaad rakho, koi bhi term skip mat karo:

TermMatlab
Delegation mapWorkflow jo step-by-step likha gaya ho, har step classified (AI-appropriate/human-retained/collaborative) ek reason ke sath
ReversibilityKya step ko undo kiya ja sakta hai agar AI galat kare
StakesBad case mein error ki cost
AccountabilityKya step khud wo decision hai jiska jawab dena hai, ya ek input jo koi named person judge karta hai
AI-appropriateStep jo AI own kar sakta hai (reversible, low-stakes, ek input produce karta hai)
Human-retainedStep jo poori tarah insaan ka hai (irreversible, high-stakes, ya khud decision hai)
CollaborativeStep jahan AI produce karta hai aur ek named person judge karta hai
Over-delegationAI ko utna dena jitna risk profile justify nahi karta
Halo delegationStep AI ko dena kyunke pichla step acha gaya
The unstaffed gateCollaborative step jiski review ab actually nahi ho rahi
Under-specificationOutput pehli response se galat, kyunke prompt ne zaroori cheez di hi nahi
Context overloadOutput jo session badhne ke sath degrade ho
Stale configurationOutput jo chupke se degrade hota hai kyunke ek configuration drift kar gayi
Expectation mismatchTask jo maangta hai jo tool kar hi nahi sakta
The diagnostic sequencePrompt, context length, feature/model, configuration, phir task fit, sasta pehle
PromotionEk fix ko conversation se nikal kar configuration mein le jana
Rule, reference, procedureTest jahan promoted fix jaani chahiye: standing instruction, knowledge base, ya Skill
Map ownerEk named person jo batay ke map abhi bhi asal workflow describe karta hai
Scheduled readMap ki periodic review
BaselineWorkflow ki measurement, change se pehle
Parallel runPurana aur naya workflow sath chalana, kuch cycles ke liye
Escalation signalDoosre log ab kisi cheez pe depend karte hain, matlab wo prompt-and-iterate se bahar nikal gayi

Source Note

Ye Cybrum notes Agent Factory book (agentfactory.panaversity.org) ke “Workflow Design & Diagnosis” crash course par based hain, uski copy nahi. Original source dekho: agentfactory.panaversity.org/docs/workflow-design-diagnosis-crash-course.

Self-Test

Khud Se Poocho

Pehle khud answer do, phir sawal pe click kar ke answer check karo.

1Ek expense workflow ka step 3 total nikalta hai aur policy-limit se upar ka amount compute karta hai. Ye AI-appropriate hai ya human-retained, aur kaun carry karega?
AI-appropriate hai, kyunke total reversible hai aur approval step pe check hota hai, carried by code execution hai kyunke ye arithmetic hai. Numeric hona kabhi khud AI ko step dene ki wajah nahi hai, ye sirf implementation column decide karta hai.
2Ek team ne 4 mahine acha drafting dekh kar low-value responses AI ko unsupervised send karne dene ka socha. Ye kaunsi mapping error hai?
Halo delegation. Sending irreversible aur external hai. Drafting quality draft ke baare mein evidence hai, is baare mein nahi ke unreviewed send safe hai.
3Ek fresh chat mein pehli response hi galat hai, kuch degrade nahi hua. Timing kya batati hai?
Under-specification. Session fresh thi aur pehla jawab hi galat tha, isliye context ko fill hone ka waqt hi nahi mila, prompt ne zaroori cheez di hi nahi.
4Ek personal checklist ab 3 account managers aur HR use kar rahe hain. Ye kya signal hai?
Escalation signal, dependency ka. Doosre log ab is pe depend karte hain, matlab uptime, access control, aur ek fixed guarantee chahiye, ye ab prompt-and-iterate ka kaam nahi raha.
53 coordinators ke updates individually consistent hain, lekin director har hafte unhe ek voice mein rewrite karta hai. Ye kaunsa friction signal hai?
Variance. Har insaan ka apna output consistent hai, inconsistency sirf logon ke darmiyan hai, isliye reviewer pe dikhti hai. Fix ek shared Skill hai jo sabko ek format de.
6Ek disappointing output ke baad, first instinct sabse capable model pe switch karna hai. Diagnostic sequence iske baare mein kya kehti hai?
Ye ladder ke neeche se ek move hai, prompt aur context length check karne se pehle. Sequence sasta pehle chalti hai: prompt, context length, feature/model, configuration, phir task fit.
7Contract review mein playbook-flag AI-appropriate hai, lekin expense workflow mein wahi tarah ka check collaborative ban jata hai. Kya decide karta hai?
Ye ke koi agli row mein flags parhta hai ya nahi. Contract review mein human turant redline pe flags dekhta hai, expense workflow mein koi downstream nahi re-read karta. Step nahi badla, ye badla ke koi uske baad khada hai ya nahi.
8"AI drafts, manager reviews" map pe likha hai, lekin manager ab har Friday poori queue ek batch mein approve karta hai bina individual cases khole. Is step ki asal state kya hai?
Practically automated. Collaborative step jiski review ab nahi ho rahi wo automated step hai, chahe map abhi bhi collaborative likhe. Ye khamosh se hota hai kyunke map wo describe karta hai jo design kiya gaya, jo chal raha hai wo nahi.
9Ek bad output bahar nikal jata hai. Design karne wale ne pehle se kaunse 2 decisions liye hone chahiye the?
Ye kaise rukega (kaun bina permission ke rok sakta hai), aur incident se map mein kya badlega. Baaki 2 (kya bahar gaya, kisay batana hai) response ke waqt decide hote hain, lekin ye 2 design time pe hi decide hone chahiye.
10Client ke risk function ko workflow describe karte waqt sabse zyada trust kaunsi sentence kamati hai?
Wo jo control seedha bataye, jaise: "Drafting AI-assisted hai. Ek qualified lawyer har term review aur approve karta hai, sign-off ke bina kuch nahi jata." Gate ko "automatically" ke peeche chupana pehla visible error ke waqt trust todta hai.